A Brief Background of CRPF
The MIRPS (Marco Integral Regional para la Protección y Soluciones) is a structure that is directed by states and facilitated by the UNHCR, Central American Integration System (SICA) and the larger United Nations organization, and the Organisation of American States (OAS). Through its Comprehensive Regional Protection Framework (CRPF) policy, it unites Belize, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Honduras, and Panama. It receives support from a variety of coordinating States and non-state actors. It helps the refugees, internally displaced people, asylum seekers, and returnees who necessitate international safeguarding.
MIRPS through CRPF aims to increase the operational capacity of Central American States to respond to forced displacement, as a growing number of refugees stresses on the national protection and safety systems. With this framework, the actions pertaining to the rights of migrants and refugees, as well as basic services access, legal support, and long-term integration or resettlement options can be addressed faster.
This framework will also assist in collaborating with a variety of stakeholders to develop a strategy that is both really all-encompassing and sustainable to follow a shared regional responsibility which comprises of the following objectives-
i) Strengthening safety of member states
ii) Promoting concrete prevention measures
iii) Promoting solutions for displacement concerning each country’s national circumstances.
Where does CRPF Stand Today?
The CRPF policy comprises priorities for the asylum systems and internal displacement, where the formation of an expert working group to direct operations is addressed. As well as there are some durable solutions introduced in 2020, namely local governments and private sector cooperation which are not enough to mitigate the regional sovereignty, economic, and security risks. The following issue requires it to be well-strategized to reach an efficient, sustainable, and effective solution and as per the diverse strength of the stakeholders who can help to improve the situation by playing different roles. It is important to address the CRPF with more relevant strategies like social security, as it could help bridge the distance between the state, IOs, and people who are suffering due to migration or systematic delay.
Who are the Responsible Actors?
To understand the impact of CRPF and its effectiveness, one needs to understand why refugee migration, Asylums, and internal displacements happen. Two major reasons outlined by several sources specified conflict and climate as the key actors.
Conflict as a cause: Migration takes into account both push and pull elements to explain migration; although war is regarded as a push factor, it is sometimes not given much thought. The origins of the war are frequently unknown, and attention is typically drawn to its most obvious effects, such as the inflow of refugees and internally displaced people. For example – The most recent data available for Honduras is from 2018 when an estimated 247,000 persons were internally displaced. A study of current developments is hampered by the absence of information. Similarly, in Guatemala, the most recent point of data goes back to 1997, when the internal turmoil in the nation caused 242,000 people to be displaced.
Climate as a cause: Due to growing debate over how to categorize and protect transnational climate migrants under international law, climate migration has become a trending topic, it refers to individuals fleeing their homes as a result of slower-moving climate problems, as effective in their daily lives, such as growing water stress, diverse weather effects such as rising temperature, droughts, heat, and floods. The majority of climate migration is increasing from internal shifts to cross-border migration. In several cases, catastrophic weather coupled with resources like natural subsidence and oil and gas operations are uprooting entire towns and driving people to seek safety elsewhere.
In October, Julia (tropical storm) strengthened into a hurricane and crossed many Caribbean nations before making landfall on the east coast of Central America. It resulted in 72,000 displaced people in eight nations, with 56% of those occurring in Guatemala. Hurricanes Iota and Eta combined caused 1.9 million people to be displaced in 2020, and many of the areas of Central America that Julia hit were still recuperating from their effects. El Nina’s influence is thus having a prognostic effect.
Consequences of Implementing New Strategies Within CRPF
Internal displacement has an impact on people’s lives, safety, and well-being. However, it can also limit their economic potential, resulting in annual financial losses and jeopardizing entire nations’ socio-economic growth. Among the other possible causes of statelessness are migration, nomadism, and forced displacement. For example, since 2017, the UNHCR has included in its reported statelessness estimates individuals who are also stateless refugees or asylum seekers from Myanmar, internally displaced people in Myanmar, or other individuals of concern. This resulted from the scale of the Rohingya people that were uprooted both inside and outside of Myanmar (since 2017, at least one million have been uprooted annually). Reports of the dual status of the displaced Rohingya populations in Bangladesh and Myanmar were made in 2017 and 2018. India, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand were among the countries where displaced Rohingya people were reported to have a dual status in 2019. Implementation of CRPF with fresh strategies can be like a game theory where changes may result in positive or negative results, parallelly it will be time and finance-consuming. Highlighting CRPF’s relevancy in maintaining Social Security of refugees, asylum seekers and internally displaced individuals
We can examine the activities and functions of CRPF via an empirical lens in light of the increasing flow of refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons to identify areas for improvement. For instance, in the case of Mexico, it has been demonstrated that, in comparison to previous years, the number of refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced persons rose by 647,080 individuals from 2022 (mid-year) to 2023. This shows the disbalance in the effectiveness of CRPF and other relevant policies it, which requires stronger and more cooperative integrity.
Eventually, between August 2021 and April 2022, Human Rights Watch conducted telephone and in-person interviews with over 100 migrants, asylum seekers, representatives of UN agencies and organisations that support migrants’ rights, as well as officials from Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico in Tapachula, Tecun Uman and Guatemala, which is close to the main border crossing. An excerpt from Ximena’s interview with HRW is provided below,
It’s hard to find someplace to live here. The shelters are awful; I don’t feel safe there with my children. I recently found an apartment. The landlord told me the building doesn’t allow foreigners; it’s written in the lease. He told me if the neighbours hear my accent or figure out I’m Honduran, he’ll evict me. -Ximena, 31, Honduras (Human Rights Watch,2022)
With the information discussed above, we may conclude that there is a need for social security, as well as contributions from critical actors that can make a difference. Let us look at various policy options for improving CRPF.
Looking At More Policy Alternatives for CRPF
Several pull factors for migration, asylum seeking and displacements can start with economic considerations such as the need for labor, high earnings, extensive social benefits, well-functioning healthcare and education systems, robust economic growth, low cost of living, and technology are among the pull factors. Non-economic variables include property rights, freedoms and rights of others, law and order, amenities, and networks of family and friends. Addressing the underlying causes of displacement, fostering regional cooperation, and guaranteeing the safety of vulnerable communities are all necessary for developing viable policy solutions for a Comprehensive Regional Safety Framework (CRPF) in Central America. Here are a few such policy options:
1. Resolving the Root Economic and Political Causes:
Peacebuilding and Conflict Resolution via Diplomatic Channels: It is important to use diplomatic channels to resolve problems within and between the countries in the region, keeping in mind the root causes of displacement.
Economic Integrity: Aside from tackling the economic problems that cause displacement, factors like lowering poverty and inequality and implementing sustainable development measures must be put into practice. On the other hand, promoting policies that raise employment, handle funding for the victims, focus on economic integration, and raise the living standards of the countries in Central America is crucial.
2. Institutional and Legal Reforms:
Unifying Refugee Laws: Work to harmonize the asylum and refugee laws of the Central American countries in order to guarantee consistent protection standards. For example Significant alterations to the legal frameworks controlling international protection, nationality, and statelessness are part of El Salvador’s proposed constitutional modifications. The Commission for the Determination of Refugee Status (CODER) is currently reviewing El Salvador’s proposed international protection law. This would update and strengthen the current legal framework to ensure fuller application of international instruments on human rights and international refugee law. A similar framework named COMAR works for Mexico which can be a collaborator with CRPF.
Improving Domestic Asylum Procedures: Increasing the ability and efficacy of national asylum systems to handle applications equitably and expeditiously. In an endeavor to “liberalize” Tibet, China targeted indigenous Tibetans in 1950. The Chinese Marxist philosophy, which pushed changes on Tibetan social and political culture, was opposed to Tibetan Buddhist practices and instruction by the Dalai Lama, their spiritual leader. To defend their identity and self-esteem, the Dalai Lama and thousands of other Tibetans fled to Arunachal Pradesh (NEFA) in India in 1959. India had accommodated approximately 110,000 Tibetan refugees by 2001.
The Central Tibetan Administration works as a Tibetan-run network for institutions established in Dharamsala that functions as the Tibetan government-in-exile,supported by the refugees who hold the ability to work and own property in India.However, the refugees do not enjoy the same rights as Indian citizens, such as the right to travel freely with an official Indian passport or to engage formally in Indian politics. The Central Tibetan Administration is responsible for appointing the person in charge of overseeing Tibetan refugee settlement in India. A major part of Tibetan refugees have largely settled in Dharamsala, which serves as the Dalai Lama’s residence in exile in northern India, due to the limited agricultural land available in the settlements there.
3. Focusing on Social Security
Access to Education: Assuring that displaced children and youth have access to a top-notch education is crucial, given the significance of education for long-term stability.
Skill Development Programmes: Implement programmes for skill development and vocational training to increase the employability of displaced individuals.
Additionally, inclusive elements like regional adaptation strategies like early emergency system, climate change adaptation to lessen its consequences and reduce migration as a result of environmental factors can aid in a transformation. The following options could be time-consuming, passive, cooperation in doubt, and correcting loopholes as per modern times might waver the older ones.
Recommendation! Recommendation!
Several recommendations are possible with the intention of addressing the complex issues surrounding displacement in Mexico and Central America while promoting a cooperative regional strategy where all the parties concerned would need to dedicate time, money, and energy to the implementation. Before looking for more solutions to this zero-sum game, we need to understand the possibilities and situations around us.
The most crucial suggestion, though, is to take into account livelihood options in order to ensure that displaced teenagers and children have access to social security through quality education, skill-based learning, and greater opportunities. Looking at SDGs 2030, implementing SDG 4 ( Quality Education) and 17 ( Partnerships for the Goals), with skill-development initiatives to increase the employability of displaced individuals can enhance the CRPF Framework. This would help displaced persons obtain access to livelihood opportunities and vocational training to promote self-reliance. For example: In Mexico, in the Thematic Round Table on Educational Inclusion and the Inter-Agency Round Table on Refugees and Complementary Protection, the Ministry of Public Education included asylum seekers and refugees in the National Strategy for the Safe Return to Classes for the 2021–2022 school year. Similarly building a community/supporting an NGO like the SIRIUS network can help the refugees learn, get educated, and further get job opportunities to support themselves economically/ financially. IMF and IOM can help civil societies with education and resource funding as per the situational/ population requirement. This can be helpful in several ways apart from self-reliance,
A fast response transmission with the help of self-reliant or self-aware individuals while implementing Responsibility to protect at times of conflict resolution and helping migrants. Growth in the economic and cultural diversity of the asylum country. Getting closer to SDG 2030 goals like quality education due to a new skill and learning-based strategies, zero hunger and no poverty due to opportunity to income, decent work and economic growth in the asylum country, and finally partnership for the goals.
In conclusion, refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced individuals are among those who require international protection, and as per UNHCR, refugees can come from a range of backgrounds and have various statuses, which can be addressed through a variety of innovative techniques such as increasing social security through skill-based, educational, and opportunity-based learning. The CIRF should be strengthened and examined through different perspectives, so that those compelled to flee/migrate from conflicts can get the right to a dignified and productive life ahead.
Bibliography –
‘Comprehensive Regional Protection and Solutions Framework’. (2023). https://www.acnur.org/fileadmin/Documentos/BDL/2017/11273.pdf [Accessed 19 Nov. 2023].
Weiss, T.G. and Wilkinson, R. (2014). International organization and global governance. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, Ny: Routledge, An Imprint Of The Taylor & Francis Group.
The Global Compact on Refugees | UNHCR. (n.d.). MIRPS (Marco Integral Regional para la Protección y Soluciones).https://globalcompactrefugees.org/gcr-action/countries/mirps-marco-integral-regional-para-la-proteccion-y-soluciones#:~:text=The%20MBPS%20is%20a%2 [Accessed 19 Nov. 2023].
Australia for UNHCR. YouTube. What is the Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework (CRRF)? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U-qRog6ZWc [Accessed 19 Nov. 2023].
The White House. (2021). Executive Order on Creating a Comprehensive Regional Framework to Address the Causes of Migration, to Manage Migration Throughout North and Central America, and to Provide Safe and Orderly Processing of Asylum Seekers at the United States Border. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/02/02/executive-order-creating-a-comprehensive-regional-framework-to-address-the-causes-of-migration-to-manage-migration-throughout-north-and-central-america-and-to-provide-safe-and-orderly-processing/
OAS (2009). OAS – Organization of American States: Democracy for peace, security, and development. [online] OAS – Organization of American States. https://www.oas.org/en/media_center/press_release.asp?sCodigo=E-076/23#:~:text=The%20Comprehensive%20Regional%20Protection%20and%20Solutions%20Framework%20(MIRPS)%20is%20an [Accessed 19 Nov. 2023].
Comprehensive Regional Solutions Framework.[online] UNHCR and MIRPS, pp.1–10. https://www.acnur.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/5b50db084.pdf [Accessed 19 Nov. 2023].
Council on Foreign Relations. (n.d.). Ten Graphics That Explain the U.S. Struggle With Migrant Flows in 2022. https://www.cfr.org/article/ten-graphics-explain-us-struggle-migrant-flows-2022#chapter-title-0-4
Relief web. (2023). Central America and Mexico: Refugees, asylum-seekers and internally displaced people | Mid-Year 2022 – Mexico | ReliefWeb. https://reliefweb.int/report/mexico/central-america-and-mexico-refugees-asylum-seekers-and-internally-displaced-people-mid-year-2022.
Search | GCSP. [online] https://www.gcsp.ch/search?s=mexico+migration+policy [Accessed 21 Nov. 2023].
IDMC. (2019). Home. [online] Available at: https://www.internal-displacement.org/.
IRRS,EGRIS. Expert Group on Refugee and Internally Displaced Persons Statistics International Recommendations on Refugee Statistics. (2018). Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/Standards-and-Methods/files/Principles_and_Recommendations/International-Migration/2018_1746_EN_08-E.pdf
Anand, T. (2020). World’s Most Successful Refugee Community – The Case of Tibetan Refugees in India. CJP. https://cjp.org.in/worlds-most-successful-refugee-community-the-case-of-tibetan-refugees-in-india/#:~:text=In%20an%20attempt%20to%20save.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2020). Refworld | India: Information on Tibetan refugees and settlements. Refworld. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3f51f90821.html
Crippa, A., And D’agostino, G. and Luca, P. (2022). Conflict as a Cause of Migration.https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112327/1/MPRA_paper_112327.pdf.
FRONTLINE/World . (2001). Mexico. Wayne Cornelius Interview | PBS. [online] www.pbs.org.https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/mexico704/interview/cornelius.html [Accessed 21 Nov. 2023].