Not too long ago, as I was returning from a friend’s place, my dad called with an unusual request. Instead of asking about my whereabouts, he asked me to book an appointment at a pet spa for our furry friend, Zui. Her long fur had become a challenge for her to manage, prompting the need for a trim. The price tag for this grooming service? A hefty ₹2000.
During my journey home, I witnessed a heartwarming scene—a young child sharing biscuits with a stray dog by the roadside. This simple act of kindness reminded me that compassion extends beyond financial constraints. It evoked thoughts about the affordability of pet care and, as I seamlessly budgeted for Zui’s trim, I couldn’t shake off the image of the child and the stray dog. This reflection drove me to recognize the barrier that the cost of pet care poses for many in experiencing the simple joy of having a furry companion.
I truly think that a major barrier preventing many people and families from enjoying the company of animals is the high expense of pet care in India. This viewpoint emphasizes the socioeconomic divide in pet ownership, which is a fact that only people with significant financial resources can afford the related costs. Although I consider myself fortunate to be able to support my pets, the difficulties encountered by many of my animal-loving friends highlight the larger problem of financial limitations impeding pet ownership.
This point of view is important because it clarifies a basic human right in our society. The wealthy should not be the only ones who can enjoy the happiness and company that pets provide. Financial constraints prevent many capable and caring people from meeting this fundamental human need. My friends’ struggle, who love animals but are unable to adopt pets, is a poignant reminder of the wider effects of financial limitations.
There is a clear financial difference between pet owners with high and poor incomes when it comes to veterinary treatment in India. Rich people frequently have access to well-equipped clinics and specialized veterinary services, making it easier to pay for routine checkups and emergency care. The Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organizations (FIAPO) conducted a survey that revealed that pet owners with higher incomes spent an average of ₹5,000 per year on veterinary treatment. Low-income households, on the other hand, only set aside a far lower percentage of their budget—an average of ₹2,000 each year. Due to financial limitations, low-income pet owners frequently have to forego certain necessary procedures, resulting in differences in the frequency and quality of veterinarian care.
The economic disparity in pet care is further highlighted by India’s low cost of premium pet food. Rich people can spend more money on high-end pet food brands that emphasize nutrition. Rich pet owners spend an average of ₹3,000 per month on high-quality pet food, according to figures from the National Institute of Nutrition. On the other hand, low-income families may only be able to afford ₹500 per month for more affordable pet food options due to financial constraints. Because pets from lower-income households might not receive the same amount of dietary care as those from higher-income households, this disparity leads to a nutritional gap.
The initial expenses linked to pet ownership are indicative of the economic differences between those with high and low incomes. Richer pet owners can afford the upfront costs, which can reach up to ₹10,000 in the first month for things like beds, toys, and grooming equipment. Low-income families, on the other hand, might have to set aside a sizeable amount of their monthly budget to pay for these early pet-related costs. For many low-income families, the initial setup fees are too much to bear, which keeps them from enjoying the benefits of pet ownership.
People in India with greater earnings have easier access to pet insurance, which is an essential safety net for unforeseen veterinary bills. Rich households may find the average monthly payment of ₹1,000 to be a reasonable outlay, which would encourage greater adoption of pet insurance in this group. Nevertheless, low-income families choose not to purchase pet insurance because they see the costs as an added financial burden. As a result, this choice exposes them financially in the event of an emergency involving their pet, aggravating the already existing inequities in pet care.
In conclusion, the financial challenges associated with pet ownership in India create a stark divide between those who can afford the joy of having a pet and those who cannot. Society and policymakers must recognize and address these disparities. This could involve implementing measures such as subsidizing veterinary care, promoting affordable and locally sourced pet food options, and establishing initiatives that offer financial assistance to economically challenged individuals and families wishing to experience the love and companionship that pets bring. By acknowledging and addressing the economic barriers to pet ownership, we can work towards building a more inclusive society where the joy of having a furry friend is accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial status.
This blog was created as part of Via News Didi’s Re-imagining Media Program
http://www.vianewsdidi.com