Israel’s uninterrupted bombings over the last several weeks pointed out that the Gazans remained the worst sufferers. There are so many explanations for Iran’s sceptical hesitation to ably implicate itself in the continued combat on behalf of Hamas. Iran does not seem to be inclined to repudiate Hamas, its reportedly strategic asset in that part of devastated land undeniably.
Rather than being set idly by the situation, it is probably to continue using pressure on both Israel and the United States. It evolves through Hezbollah and its proxies in Iraq and Syria without escalating the conflict to a full-scale regional war. The war in Gaza may, however, tilt towards Iran’s nuclear programme, as has been reported.
There are powerful voices in Iran, mainly in the hard-liner camp. They are vociferously upholding that the country’s most important mechanism to discourage the devastation of Hamas hinges on its strong decision to fully follow nuclear capabilities.
They believe that Iran’s trump card lies in its threat to augment unstable nuclear arms, showcasing crucial support for its allies. It more or less looks similar to its recorded support for the Syrian Assad government.
This logic reportedly attained considerable momentum when Israeli ultra-nationalist Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu endorsed the dropping of some kind of atomic bomb on the Gaza Strip to kill everyone. Was it a preferred choice for him?