It makes no difference for the e-rickshaw puller to wait for a little lengthier duration at the residence of the particular student who does not leave his habit of making delays despite several calls in the morning. His obsession is neither acceptable to the driver nor proper to other students stuffed into the rickshaw. Noticing the boy’s rigid attitude, all have to bear the situation.
The driver holding the handle of the battery-driven rickshaw in a fit of instant irritation, moves on the road to reach school on time. He adopts this option just to prevent other students from being irritated unnecessarily. He also thinks that the delay might cause some problem. Who would stop and think about it, right now? The guardian does not appear to discipline his ward. Strangely enough, the boy’s younger brother remains prepared for school and no complaint comes against him.
The man hired to drop the students appears to follow the city bus kind of schedule. He comes and waits for the boy but delays on his part annoy him daily. He finds no other way than to move on the road to complete the journey. Even the girls sitting on the e-rickshaw do not like waiting a little longer. They start screaming for taking them to the school gate just in time. It was just on Friday the rickshaw man left the boy and he had to go by other means. Growing up boys are lambasted for compulsively pursuing this odd habit every time. The rickshaw man is not rude, arrogant, or uncaring. But what is perceived is that the boy looks more like somebody emotionally aloof in himself.
However, the particular boy does not evade his attitude of delaying tactics. Being a student of class 11 he remains not as disciplined as he should need to be. It seems plausible that the boy would never learn to show curiosity in being punctual as well as responsible. So, why does proceed with disproportionate exercise for disciplining him to continue?