The most astonishing point of the United Nations Climate Summit COP 27 is that its sponsor is a beverage company that has been listed as a disastrous plastic polluter of the world. According to a recent study, it goes so for a fifth time in a row, followed by its immediate market competitor PepsiCo. It can be said that it has been overstated to deflect the fact that it is a net polluter.
The campaigners are by and large a little bit more baffled by quite popular beverage company Coca-Cola’s role in Cop27 and have accused it of greenwashing, as they say that 99 per cent of plastic was clearly manufactured using fossil fuels like crude oil, natural gas and through some processes, even coal.
The soft drinks company had, in the year 2019, admitted that it produces 3 million tonnes of plastic packaging a year — similar to 200,000 bottles a minute. This year, the brand announced that it consents to 25 per cent of its packaging globally being reusable by the coming year of 2030.
If we have ever thought that big events finish conclusively, we might be reaching something plausible. Though the sponsors claim they want to stand for affordably better messages with an influencing impact, they do not consider evading the undesirable thresholds. Their message is insecure and inauthentic, as is often guessed. They also do not feel touchy-feely as most of the time the messages seem sweet crap. Who minds knowing specifically why sponsors like everything getting on in an erroneous direction?