How can it be ensured what is right and what is wrong? It is possible only when we know the truth. A whole fresh story has been debated these days. It is all about our independence. So far, leaders of the freedom struggle have been discussed, but now the question has been raised over the authenticity of the freedom won in the year 1947.
All those who did not take part in the freedom movement or have not gone through the pages of struggle will have no hesitation in uttering about their flawed concept. All those who did not strive for the freedom movement seem to be assisting in creating a differently confused voice.
Each of the stories contained in this perspective is being introduced by popular personalities. These stories represent a systemically distorted theme just in the name of freedom of expression.
We further emphasise that attempting to silence one voice does not silence the voices of all those who do not bear such unnecessary points. Why should they tolerate or legitimise the cheap talks arising every day? More importantly, we will continue to share only those stories that instil confidence and strive to proceed with more to create a better environment for all of us.
We are hesitant to accept those odd tales that can not portray the exactness of the truth. Even one story can be described as too many, for each story runs with agonised freedom fighters in a relatively adverse setting.
Could the recent statement on the country’s independence not be strongly criticised? Disagreements and taunts prevail, but what if the honour was not revoked?