Site icon Youth Ki Awaaz

Bollywood Dual Stand

People are having a problem on the discussion of Bollywood personalities. They are on the safer side talking about Deepika Padukone. Karan Johar is having trouble with media outrage on his connections. Anushka is feeling offended on her name being taken in the commentary box. But if you consider the history of bollywood then you will realise that it is never ashamed of abusing in public and passing vulgar comments on the women. So, shouldn’t the drama happening on instagram and twitter in the name of “feminism” be considered a fake trial? Do you recall the lesson of principles which famous bollywood personalities have taught people? Someone threw a bit of waste on the road and the “great” Anushka stopped her car and not only scolded the man but also made a short video which was viral on social media. But the same Anushka is having a problem with Sunil Gavaskar in spite of the fact that he was talking only about how the pandemic hampered the cricketers. Just like bollywood which is now on the radar for drugs, is talking about the principles. Almost most of people will recall the video of Deepika having the title My Choice. She said in that video that the body, soul and mind she inherits is only hers and, thus, the choices would be her’s. She said, “When I come home is my choice. I have sex before marriage or after marriage depends on her choice”. Well she told was in some way making tuning but isn’t she was too extrovert that she forgets that millions of the teenage girls of small town and cities will follow her and be exploited and their safety would be compromised on the issue of having sex. I am not measuring those lines on the word of orthodoxy but when you hold the tag of ‘Activist’ and you are now a serious offender in the connection of drugs, you should be ashamed on being called as an ‘Activist’. When the entire bollywood is on the radar of Drugs. These things should be recalled. The preaching what the deepika had given on the name of ‘My Choice’ is now taking as an account by the journalist like Rahul Kanwal and he is now shouting that what the chat of watsapp has been leaked is a threat on privacy. This is an another fact that when the same media house which he represents extracted the watsapp chats was a proud moment for him. But now this has become a ‘Character Assassination’. How fool they are that on the name of Feminism they are justifying the act of drug dealing. Did they even consider that the four letter word ‘DRUG’ has devastated barbarically millions of Families and individuals. People are proclaiming on the name of Privacy, being women to save druggist. Height of tomfoolery that they are telling that Lord Shiva was also having a form of Drugs. But when they themselves are being dragged in the same drug scandals then they start writing long instagram posts and stories on excuse themselves on the name of ‘Toxic Musculanities’. When the films of the Actors/Actresses go for releases, they want that media should do a lot of reporting and coverage on their films. They never gets tired on giving interviews. Simply because that is called Business. But when the same media is covering them when their names flaunted on the drugs connections then they are spitting venoms on them by calling ‘Conspiracy of defaming’, ‘Character Assassination’, etc. Surprising thing which we got that the actress who smashed the word Patriarchy in her speech on ‘My Choice’, requested the investigating Agency to let her husband along with her during interrogation. The word ‘Character Assassination’ is basically a tool for them as when they got accused of something and nothing works then they throw their Brahmastra of being Victim of Character assassination. What Character Assassination really means. We have to go back to year 2015 and recall the AIB show. In AIB Arjun Kapoor, Ranveer singh , Karan Johar were as the Anchor. The mother of Karan Johar was also present and in her presence karan and did saturnalia. Many other famous personalities family were also present.The called the show ‘Roasting’. In a very cool way they explained the audience that Roasting is a Comedic Act which started in Newyork in the year 1949 and now is globally accepted. The person who is now abusing the media since his ex employees names have came in the drug case, is the same person who was the ‘Roast Master’. The the intro they happily told that “ A pilot, a Sailor, an Actor, A model and an architect is going to Fu** everyone in a happy way.” In the intro himself told that “may be my mother will need an ambulance after the end of the show.” The the Audience Anurag Kashyap was also present who is teaching everyone the lesson of principles nowadays. They mocked a comedian on the basis of his skin tone, they told a women comedian very less popular, they used the word ‘As****le’ word in a very frequent way, Karan Johar used the word ‘Pervert’ for Ranveer but nobody questioned them of doing character assassination. What Karan Johar told about deepika in that interview will blow your mind out. He told “ I am not saying Ranveer only do bad films, last time he was inside something good was Deepika Padukone.” When a film director publically told Ranveer being inside Deepika, both Ranveer and Deepika was laughing at him. Nobody complained about Character Assassination. Oh! That was a roast? Taking money and abusing each other is what the Roast is all about. Yes, if you are a Group Admin of a watsapp Group in which the Drug dealing was happening and someone posted a report on that then that should be called as a ‘Character Assassination’ for sure. Anushka’s name was also dragged on that show. Karan told that ‘Ranveer has completed 4 years in industry but out of 4 years he spend 3 years managing Anushka.’ But Anushka told that that was a Good humour in response. According to her the show that openly Abuses Mothers and sisters was a Good humour and should not to be taken seriously. She started talking about the democratic setup that the people may have different of opinions and when the Greatest Gentleman of Cricket Sunil Gavaskar told his mate in the commentary box that ‘Virat was seen playing Anushka’s bowling’ then the feminist Anushka took that as a prestige issue. Poor Anushka did’nt got that the Commentators were telling about the adverse impact of Pandemic which hampered the Cricketers. In that show Parineeti Chopra was being told in her absence that she has not came here because she was told that ‘She would be F***ed by 10 peoples infront of 4k peoples and Karan came here because he will be f***ed in front of 4k peoples. Comedian Rohan Joshi was told that he was famous only because he dated the sister of Alia Bhatt. In the audience longue Alia was seen clapping and laughing on it. Ranveer was called as a national level ‘Sex offender’ by a comedian in that show. But did anyone consider that if someone is Sex offender then there must a a victim of that offender. Flaunting the words like that isn’t they made a mockery of serious crime like offending a women? Is Crime of women expolitment is a thing if making fun? If the Elite personalities of bollywood are having fun on these issues and they make issue of mere a slap into a 4 km instagram post I wonder what is the definition of being called as Elite Class? Recently Payal Ghosh is facing the same heat of the dual Stand of bollywood. She accused Anurag Kashyap of Assault, but she has been mocked by the bollywood lobbies of weakening metoo movement completely thrown aside by the Great Pseudo Intellectuals simply because the accused is Anurag. The people of bollywood who made a mockery ofSex assault Crimes are now accusing Payal Ghosh and even they even cancelled her license being called as a women. How can they back an accused without knowing the facts. Why this is so that India has been characterised as one of the “countries with the lowest per capita rates of rape”.But the real figures are widely estimated to be much higher as a significant percentage of rapes go unreported. Ironical is that there are great legal difficulties in rape trials. Sexual assault is one of the few crimes where proof lies not in the physical facts of the matter, but in the subjective intentions of those involved. One person’s word against another’s, with no corroborating witnesses, is highly problematic for a legal system predicated on the concepts of innocent until proven guilty and proof beyond reasonable doubt. Now it’s high time to no call for the wholesale abandonment of basicers, blame intractable issues of principles, and swathe the accused of women victims of violent assault with sufficient legal proceedings.Then our nation purports to be a civilised country.

Exit mobile version