Site icon Youth Ki Awaaz

(WTP) Woman- the lesser man

Women are treated differently, from an employer’s preference to the meticulous use of certain languages or words in conversations, which necessarily do not have premediated intentions but nonetheless create a perception that women are weaker beings as compared to men. There are certain ‘gendered words’ that come automatically and effortlessly while describing or introducing a woman at the workplace such as ‘sweet’ instead of ‘pleasant’, ‘caring’ instead of ‘inclusive’ or ‘sensible’. Even in binomials, we see male versions/terms come first- Mr and Mrs, husband and wife, boys and girls. So one may ask what has it to do with gender equality?

Well, in short, these are just  micro reflections of ground reality -subtly. In other words, these are not the real issues but a representation or reflection of the real issues. Patriarchy has normalised misogynistic behaviour towards socially constructed ‘genders’. I want to address some of what I think are the subtle and not so subtle forms of conscious and unconscious prejudices against women. These behaviours are what I consider ‘the projection of patriarchal misogyny’ against women.

In most of the conservative families, this is one of the reasons why women’s education is not given priority. Rather they invest in her dowry than spend on her education. Regardless of her educational qualification, the family has to spend on her dowry anyway so why spend so much on something that has no social validity? But this seems more prevalent in lower and poor class. The rich can afford and are well educated but the practice of dowry still pervades. It is a source of sustaining the patriarchy and class structure- a modern form of caste institution.

A friend of mine said her sister is going to be a full time housewife of a guy who is not even to her liking. When asked why she has to get married, she replied

 “Because there are three of us who are all women. My mother is anxious because our relatives and society are already after my parents to get us married. It will be a shame on our family if any of us remain a spinster”. She, my friend’s sister, is a doctorate holder. Society has no logic. 

It is not fair to put so much social and familial expectations on men. However, such expectations on men does not justify the treatment of women as lesser to men. I would not be able to swallow my own saliva if I was to be put in her position. She has supported the entire family for more than 15 years with her job. But  the fact that a woman can do better than some men is still unacceptable to many. All the efforts and contributions are diluted just because she is a woman and not a man.

My friend’s sister got herself a bangs haircut after which she said to me, ” He (her father) didn’t say anything. After staring at me for a while he uttered these words ‘respect yourself‘ “. If a woman like to have a boy’s haircut or shave her head, does it mean she has no respect for her body?  When I told my father that I had shaved my hair he said “Don’t come home with it. How would you go out? You will scare the people”. My mother even asked me if I was crazy. She asked why I am so unhappy with my life. I know it’s unusual but the reactions were unexpected.

The pattern is the same in terms of judging gendered behaviours. Some are understandable because it is coming from a certain gender, not weighing on the goodness or vices of the behaviour. It is not womanly to indulge in drinking or smoking while in some families the father serves pegs (Indian term for shots, because only we use it to order drinks!) to son or vice versa. If I  have to tell someone back at home that I smoke I have to think twice before sharing lest they associate me with a lapse in moral character or as “useless” said a friend when asked if any of her parents know about her smoking habit.

Do  you ever notice the disappointed ‘ohs!’ and change in the tone of their voice when you say you are a feminist? She is seen as though she wants to differ at every possible chance. Her assertion is very often associated with her being rebellious rather than recognising and acknowledging the source -suppression and assertion are like the opposite sides of the same coin. History has time and again proven so. 

This often reflects at the workplace. There was this one instance with a research fellow I was assisting by collecting primary sources through phone interviews. I said I wanted to include women interviewee because people have an assumption that women do not know our tradition and history. His instant response was “Vili, don’t make it a gender issue”.  He went on to clarify that due to a shortage of time, it is best to collect the information at the earliest from any available source. Nevertheless, his initial reaction reflects the general perspective of gender issues, the failure to see inequalities through the gender lens or a simple denial to acknowledge the issue. I took it more as though I have provoked an irritation in  him, which is a case with many people. Anything to do with gender or gender issues tend to annoy people.

These instances are so normalised that many don’t consider it worthwhile to discuss when we have other “real issues” like  unemployment, starving population, illiteracy, failed healthcare system, Corona virus, world wars, etc (ha ha, I know). This is our patriarchal mentality— not so important, trivial disagreements which can be just brushed off. Move on. A patriarchal misogyny many have to live with, the very mentality that fails to acknowledge gender biasness as an issue . Unless we reflect on our actions which are products of social mentality, our society will always normalise misogynistic behaviour towards women.  

Exit mobile version