Site icon Youth Ki Awaaz

Is Judicial Interference In Appointment Related Matters Required?

In recent times a mere selection in government competitive examinations such as SSC, IBPS, UPSC, BPSC, Railways etc. doesn’t guarantee a confirmed job. There are several aspirants who are not satisfied with the whole recruitment process. Out of those, some might get placed in a reserved list hoping to be hired eventually. These aspirants don’t even bother to read the guidelines of the exam conducting bodies for the provisional allotment through the reserved list.

On behalf of peers and other senior mentors, they prefer filling a PIL in the Supreme Court or High Court which results in the whole recruitment process coming under the Judiciary. Conversely, Hon’ble Supreme Court of India put a stay on the process.

On the other hand, it brutally affects the fate of meritorious aspirants who finally got placed after studying day and night, following the whole rigorous process.

If we follow the proceedings of the Supreme Court, it would be a very long and hectic task to get a single motion hearing for the case, even if it is a matter of service or appointment. Now, who is responsible for the solution? Exam Conducting Bodies or the Government of India or the Supreme Court of India?

There should be a provision that all services or appointment related matters should be scrutinized under the fast track court, and all the officials or counsels related to the case should be present on the tentative dates of hearing, otherwise should be ready to face ‘show cause notices’ and heavy penalties.

Exit mobile version