By Archita Misra and Shreya Tandon:
Our ambition was to create a conference with a broad framework, incorporating key questions from diverse domains. The Conclave featured talks, panel discussions, and workshops under three broad themes, “What Makes a Good Society”, “Science and Society”, and “Arts, Culture and Society”. Over three days, students and faculty from across colleges and courses discussed and debated issues of relevance to all of us. Each of the three Plenary Lectures, delivered by eminent intellectuals, represented one of the themes. From Professor Irfan Habib, noted historian, who spoke of the relevance of the legacy of secularism from the National Movement, to Professor Satyajit Mayor, Director of the National Centre for Biological Sciences, who discussed the interdisciplinary nature of new research in Biology, and Ms. Anjolie Ela Menon, the leading contemporary artist, who delved into the history of the patronage of Art. Among many other compelling discussions taking place in over thirteen sessions spread across three days, Professor Rudrangshu Mukherjee constructed a fascinating narrative of the ideology of the 1857 revolt, Dr. Alex Watson presented a cogent account of atheistic traditions in India, Dr. Maya Saran shifted the focus from discourse to the ‘doing’ of Mathematics and Dr. Sanadhya used his insights as a cryptologist to throw light on Snowden’s revelations and their implications on individual privacy.
From Professor Irfan Habib, noted historian, who spoke of the relevance of the legacy of secularism from the National Movement, to Professor Satyajit Mayor, Director of the National Centre for Biological Sciences, who discussed the interdisciplinary nature of new research in Biology, and Ms. Anjolie Ela Menon, the leading contemporary artist, who delved into the history of the patronage of Art. Among many other compelling discussions taking place in over thirteen sessions spread across three days, Professor Rudrangshu Mukherjee constructed a fascinating narrative of the ideology of the 1857 revolt, Dr. Alex Watson presented a cogent account of atheistic traditions in India, Dr. Maya Saran shifted the focus from discourse to the ‘doing’ of Mathematics and Dr. Sanadhya used his insights as a cryptologist to throw light on Snowden’s revelations and their implications on individual privacy.
As Conveners, we ended up spending more time running around than attending talks, but the happiness of seeing rooms filled with enthusiastic attendees was more than adequate compensation. With most events continuing beyond their stipulated times because of the extended question-answer sessions, we were conflicted between the stress of keeping to schedule and the joy of seeing people share our excitement.
The whirlwind of activity of the last few weeks has given way to a strangely unfamiliar sense of tranquility. Having a single-minded purpose has consumed our time like nothing else has ever before, and this vacuum allows for reflection on how much we have learnt. This Academic Conclave has been a lesson in optimism, and the importance of following through on big ideas. St. Stephen’s College has a long history with many time-honored traditions. The fact that a simple idea and a small group of people managed to forge a new one which strengthens the culture of cross-cutting scholastic discourse, speaks to the power of student initiative and the importance of faculty members who are passionate about both teaching and learning. Having laid the groundwork, we sincerely hope that the enthusiasm we witnessed over the past three days is sustained and expanded, preserving the Academic Conclave as an enduring institution.
Take campus conversations to the next level. Become a YKA Campus Correspondent today! Sign up here.
You can also subscribe to the Campus Watch Newsletter, here.