By Khabar Lahariya:
With the recent demise of Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s [president and leader of the Ram temple movement] Ashok Singhal on Tuesday, the rise of the extremist Pravin Togadia (International Working President), a prominent face of the VHP, trying to rekindle the demands of the temple construction at the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri site is a concern. Ayodhya is a recurrent image in a corner of the national imagination, refracted through religion, politics and mythology. With this in mind, and the latest ‘dispute’ on the issue, KL reporters walked around the ghats and streets of Ayodhya to ask the people whose voices we seldom hear, what was their opinion on Quraishi’s claim.
From those who had traveled from towns in Bihar to immerse themselves in Ayodhya’s spiritual environs, to those who had set up businesses in its busy streets, our interviews overwhelmingly repeated platitudes about the unquestionable fact of Ayodhya as Ram’s birthplace. But as we ventured further from the ghats, into communities less interested and invested in the Ramayana or those more politically savvy, a refreshing hint of doubt and rationalism rang through (“Isn’t there an Ayodhya in Delhi too?”, “It’s one fact against the another fact – how do we know which is true?”) A train worth pursuing?
Watch this space as Khabar Lahariya reports from Ayodhya, in voices heard and less so.